Technology Adoption Tracker
Separating technology promotion from operational adoption, scaled use and measurable freight results.
Current FIR adoption reading
The October 22 Census release provides newer national SI (formerly AI) use context. Older supplemental evidence still describes limited functional scope; it is historical, not a current measure of freight deployment depth.
Usage is no longer rare, but adoption breadth and operational depth remain uneven. FIR does not treat a pilot, press release or vendor announcement as scaled adoption.
National adoption evidence is strong. Freight-sector comparability remains limited, so FIR withholds a universal freight-technology score.
Reference September 21–October 4, 2026; released October 22. Standard error 0.27 percentage points.
250+ employees; same reference period. Standard error 1.51 percentage points.
Historical supplement: AI users in three or fewer functions; collected November 17, 2025–February 8, 2026.
Historical supplement: augmentation-only users; same collection window, released April 23, 2026.
Adoption is growing—but size matters
Cycle 202621 reports 24.6% national use of SI (formerly AI), up 0.8 percentage point from the previous displayed 23.8%; expected use in six months was 28.6%, an expectation rather than an observed outcome. Reported use was 43.6% among employers with 250+ employees and 35.3% for 100–249 employees. The question wording in the October 22 downloaded tables now says “Super Intelligence or SI (formerly referred to as Artificial Intelligence or AI),” including examples of use; treat the comparison as indicative, not a clean like-for-like trend. Collection ran October 5–18; the prior-two-week reference window was September 21–October 4, with publication October 22.
Use does not equal transformation
Historical supplemental responses collected November 17, 2025–February 8, 2026 found 57% of adopting firms used AI in three or fewer functions and 66% used it solely to augment tasks. These retained depth measures are not refreshed by the newer core-use release. September working paper CES 26-61 relates occupational AI exposure to firm adoption, but does not establish freight-specific deployment penetration or operating results.
Freight integration remains the proving ground
USDOT posted its DrayFLEX implementation lesson July 27, 2026, drawing on a report published September 1, 2025. The historical case identifies data-format, external-feed and resource barriers. It is evidence about implementation, not a new 2026 scaled-deployment count.
What would strengthen the reading
- More freight-specific deployment counts with consistent denominators.
- Documented movement from pilot to contracted, integrated and scaled use.
- Measured changes in cost, dwell, empty miles, safety, service or labor productivity.
- Evidence that results persist beyond one facility, customer or demonstration.
From announcement to proven scale
The FIR Adoption Ladder helps decision-makers separate market attention from operational maturity. Each step reflects stronger evidence that a technology is moving from promise to dependable freight use.
1. Announced
A capability or partnership is public, but operational use has not been verified.
2. Pilot
Testing is underway in a limited fleet, facility, workflow or customer environment.
3. Deployed
A customer or operator has placed the technology into active production.
4. Integrated
The technology is connected to core workflows and used beyond a stand-alone test.
5. Proven at scale
Use has expanded across operations with repeatable, measured results over time.
Sources and methodology
- Census BTOS national and employment-size tables — released October 22, 2026, cycle 202621. Reference September 21–October 4; collection October 5–18. Weighted shares of responding in-scope employer businesses; experimental estimates with sampling and nonsampling uncertainty. The downloaded questionnaire label changed to SI (formerly AI); no explicit revision marker identified in these tables.
- Census BTOS methodology — U.S., DC and Puerto Rico employer businesses with stated industry exclusions, including railroads and USPS. Nonemployers are excluded. These estimates are national context, not freight-industry penetration.
- Census AI diffusion working paper CES 26-25 — April 2026; historical supplemental collection November 17, 2025–February 8, 2026, tables released April 23. Core AI wording broadened November 17, 2025; pre-change observations are not directly comparable.
- Census AI exposure/adoption working paper CES 26-61 — September 2026, page revised September 28; research context, not a freight adoption rate.
- USDOT DrayFLEX historical implementation lesson — posted July 27, 2026; underlying report September 1, 2025.
FIR method: Evidence is classified by adoption stage and outcome depth. National business statistics provide context but are not presented as freight-sector penetration. FIR does not count announcements as deployments or deployments as proven scale.
Follow verified freight adoption.
FIR will update this tracker as stronger deployment and outcome evidence becomes available.
Limits: The reading combines dated national employer-business context, historical supplemental depth evidence and a historical freight implementation case. It is not a complete census of freight technology. Updated October 23, 2026.
Government services: For government services, verification, registrations, forms, reporting, or instructions, always navigate to the official agency website directly. Independently verify its address before entering credentials or business information.